For large companies with a diverse set of products, services, and brands, maintaining a coherent product portfolio can pose significant challenges. As companies expand through innovation, acquisitions, and mergers, they often find themselves grappling with myriad product names, some old, some new, and some acquired. This complexity burdens internal teams and confuses customers, hindering their ability to comprehend the interconnectedness of various offerings and increasing the amount of brainpower they have to use just to navigate the portfolio. Plus, excessive and convoluted naming practices incur unnecessary investment and impede cross-selling opportunities.
To tackle these hurdles, the development of a robust naming architecture that organizes the diverse array of products within the company's portfolio is critical. A well-crafted naming architecture simplifies the naming process, fosters coherence among offerings, and facilitates customer discovery and engagement.
Brand architecture vs. naming architecture
Brand architecture focuses on the strategic organization of a company's brands or sub-brands within its product or service portfolio. Conversely, naming architecture focuses on the development and organization of individual product and service names. While the two concepts overlap, naming architecture addresses the structure and guidelines for naming products and services, ensuring consistency and clarity.
Crafting an effective naming architecture
A robust naming architecture and taxonomy categorizes products based on their role within the portfolio. Understanding these roles—essential, fortifying, and groundbreaking—guides the naming process and aligns it with broader business objectives.
- Essential Offerings: These products fulfill basic market requirements and are often named descriptively to facilitate easy comprehension. Examples include Google Maps and Apple Pages.
- Fortifying Offerings: These products strengthen existing brand perceptions and may incorporate creative elements while building on established brand equity. For instance, Amazon Echo Dot reinforces the Echo brand while introducing new features.
- Groundbreaking Offerings: These innovative products have the freedom to explore more creative naming strategies, capturing attention and differentiation. Examples include Google Chrome and Uber Eats.
Navigating naming challenges
When crafting names for products, several considerations come into play:
- Clarity and Understanding: Descriptive names enhance comprehension and trust.
- Ease of Communication: Clear names facilitate memorability.
- Primary Brand Equity: Names should reinforce the equity of the primary brand, unless they are for truly groundbreaking products that are intended to stretch the meaning of the primary brand.
- Search Engine Optimization (SEO): Descriptive names aid in online visibility and searchability.
- Legal Considerations: Names should avoid trademark infringement and protect intellectual property rights.
- Marketing Budget: Budget constraints may influence naming decisions, favoring descriptive names in resource-limited scenarios.
Strategic naming for success
A well-defined naming architecture contributes to a seamless customer experience, strengthens brand, and supports business growth. By aligning product names with strategic objectives and customer needs, companies can navigate the complexities of their product portfolios with clarity and purpose.
Effective naming is not merely about tidiness—it's about customer understanding and engagement, memorability, and reducing the need for undue marketing investment to drive consideration, trial, and cross-sell. Embrace the power of naming architecture to unlock the full potential of your product portfolio and drive business success.
Ready to deep-dive into portfolio naming and learn how to streamline and organize product names in a complex product portfolio? Download our Portfolio Naming Whitepaper.
.png)
.png)
